RECRUITING

Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy Products

Study Overview

This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.

Description

The main purpose of the Product Performance Report (formerly referred to as System Longevity Study) is to evaluate long-term performance of Medtronic market-released cardiac rhythm products by analyzing product survival probabilities.

Official Title

Medtronic CRDM Product Performance Report

Quick Facts

Study Start:1983-01
Study Completion:2040-12
Study Type:Not specified
Phase:Not Applicable
Enrollment:Not specified
Status:RECRUITING

Study ID

NCT00271180

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:Not specified
Sexes Eligible for Study:ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:No
Standard Ages:CHILD, ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
  1. * Subject is indicated for implant or within 30 days post-implant of at least one Medtronic market-released product used for a pacing, sensing or defibrillation application
  2. * Subjects who participated in a qualifying study (IDE) of a Medtronic market-released product with complete implant and follow-up data and subject or appropriate legal guardian authorizes release of subject study data
  1. * Subjects who are, or will be inaccessible for follow-up
  2. * Subjects with exclusion criteria required by local law (EMEA only)
  3. * Subjects receiving an implant of a Medtronic device at a non-participating center and the implant data and current status cannot be confirmed within 30 days after implant
  4. * Subjects implanted with a Medtronic device whose predetermined enrollment limit for that specific product has been exceeded

Contacts and Locations

Study Contact

Medtronic CRM Clinical Trials
CONTACT
medtroniccrmtrials@medtronic.com

Principal Investigator

Product Performance Report Study Leader
STUDY_CHAIR
Medtronic

Study Locations (Sites)

Birmingham, Alabama
United States
Anchorage, Alaska
United States
Chandler, Arizona
United States
Jonesboro, Arkansas
United States
Little Rock, Arkansas
United States
Bakersfield, California
United States
Chula Vista, California
United States
Los Angeles, California
United States
Palm Springs, California
United States
Rancho Mirage, California
United States
Redwood City, California
United States
Salinas, California
United States
San Diego, California
United States
Stanford, California
United States
Torrance, California
United States
Van Nuys, California
United States
Ventura, California
United States
Centennial, Colorado
United States
Colorado Springs, Colorado
United States
Denver, Colorado
United States
Lakewood, Colorado
United States
Hartford, Connecticut
United States
New Haven, Connecticut
United States
Washington, District of Columbia
United States
Bradenton, Florida
United States
Clearwater, Florida
United States
Hollywood, Florida
United States
Jacksonville, Florida
United States
Panama City, Florida
United States
Safety Harbor, Florida
United States
Sarasota, Florida
United States
Atlanta, Georgia
United States
Marietta, Georgia
United States
Evansville, Indiana
United States
Indianapolis, Indiana
United States
West Des Moines, Iowa
United States
Kansas City, Kansas
United States
Edgewood, Kentucky
United States
Louisville, Kentucky
United States
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
United States
Shreveport, Louisiana
United States
Baltimore, Maryland
United States
Bethesda, Maryland
United States
Clinton, Maryland
United States
Hyattsville, Maryland
United States
Salisbury, Maryland
United States
Silver Spring, Maryland
United States
Takoma Park, Maryland
United States
Boston, Massachusetts
United States
Lansing, Michigan
United States
Marquette, Michigan
United States
Ypsilanti, Michigan
United States
Coon Rapids, Minnesota
United States
Minneapolis, Minnesota
United States
Robbinsdale, Minnesota
United States
Rochester, Minnesota
United States
Saint Cloud, Minnesota
United States
Saint Paul, Minnesota
United States
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
United States
Columbia, Missouri
United States
Kansas City, Missouri
United States
Saint Louis, Missouri
United States
Omaha, Nebraska
United States
Marlton, New Jersey
United States
Morristown, New Jersey
United States
New Brunswick, New Jersey
United States
Ocean City, New Jersey
United States
Ridgewood, New Jersey
United States
Albuquerque, New Mexico
United States
Huntington, New York
United States
Manhasset, New York
United States
New York, New York
United States
Poughkeepsie, New York
United States
Utica, New York
United States
Durham, North Carolina
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
United States
Akron, Ohio
United States
Cincinnati, Ohio
United States
Cleveland, Ohio
United States
Columbus, Ohio
United States
Toledo, Ohio
United States
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
United States
Portland, Oregon
United States
Allentown, Pennsylvania
United States
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
United States
Danville, Pennsylvania
United States
Erie, Pennsylvania
United States
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
United States
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
United States
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
United States
Columbia, South Carolina
United States
Germantown, Tennessee
United States
Nashville, Tennessee
United States
Austin, Texas
United States
Dallas, Texas
United States
Fort Worth, Texas
United States
Houston, Texas
United States
Plano, Texas
United States
The Woodlands, Texas
United States
Tyler, Texas
United States
Burlington, Vermont
United States
Charlottesville, Virginia
United States
Olympia, Washington
United States
Spokane, Washington
United States
Madison, Wisconsin
United States
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
United States

Collaborators and Investigators

Sponsor: Medtronic

  • Product Performance Report Study Leader, STUDY_CHAIR, Medtronic

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

Study Start Date1983-01
Study Completion Date2040-12

Study Record Updates

Study Start Date1983-01
Study Completion Date2040-12

Terms related to this study

Keywords Provided by Researchers

  • Cardiac Pacing
  • Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
  • pacemaker
  • Sinus Bradycardia

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

  • Arrhythmia
  • Bradycardia
  • Heart Failure
  • Sinus Tachycardia