RECRUITING

Pictographs for Preventing Wrong-Patient Errors in NICUs

Study Overview

This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.

Description

Newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are at high risk for wrong-patient errors. Effective 2019, The Joint Commission requires that health systems adopt distinct methods of newborn identification as part of its National Patient Safety Goals. Displaying patient photographs in the electronic health record (EHR) is a promising strategy to improve identification of children and adults, but is unlikely to be effective for identifying newborns. This study assesses the use of Pictographs as a "photo equivalent" for improving identification of newborns in the NICU. This multi-site, two-arm, parallel group, cluster randomized controlled trial will test the effectiveness of Pictographs for preventing wrong-patient order errors in the NICU. Pictographs consist of three elements: 1) pictorial symbols of easy-to-remember objects (e.g., rainbow, lion); 2) the infant's given name (when available); and 3) a color-coded border indicating the infant's sex. The study will be conducted at three academic medical centers that utilize Epic EHR. All parents or guardians will be asked to select a unique Pictograph for each infant admitted to the NICU to be displayed on the isolette and in the EHR for the duration of the infant's hospital stay. All clinicians with the authority to place electronic orders in the study NICUs will be randomly assigned to either the intervention arm (Pictographs displayed in the EHR) or the control arm (no Pictographs displayed in the EHR). The main hypothesis is that clinicians assigned to view Pictographs in the EHR will have a significantly lower rate of wrong-patient order errors in the NICU versus clinicians assigned to no Pictographs. The primary outcome is wrong-patient order sessions, defined as a series of orders placed for a single patient by a single clinician that contains at least one wrong-patient order. The Wrong-Patient Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) measure, a validated, reliable, and automated method for identifying wrong-patient orders, will be used as the primary outcome measure. The Wrong-Patient RAR measure identifies one or more orders placed for a patient that are retracted within 10 minutes, and then reordered by the same clinician for a different patient within the next 10 minutes. In the validation study conducted at a large academic medical center, real-time telephone interviews with clinicians confirmed that 76.2% of RAR events were correctly identified by the measure as wrong-patient orders.

Official Title

Assessing the Effectiveness of Pictographs for Preventing Wrong-Patient Errors in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Quick Facts

Study Start:2022-03-16
Study Completion:2028-06-30
Study Type:Not specified
Phase:Not Applicable
Enrollment:Not specified
Status:RECRUITING

Study ID

NCT03960099

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:Not specified
Sexes Eligible for Study:ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:No
Standard Ages:CHILD, ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
  1. * All infants receiving care in the study NICUs for whom an order was placed during the study period.
  2. * All clinicians with the authority to place electronic orders in the NICU and who placed electronic orders during the study period.
  1. * None

Contacts and Locations

Study Contact

Jason Adelman, MD, MS
CONTACT
646-317-4803
jsa2163@cumc.columbia.edu
Tony Lin, MD
CONTACT
(917) 628-6522
akl17@cumc.columbia.edu

Principal Investigator

Jason Adelman, MD, MS
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University

Study Locations (Sites)

Johns Hopkins Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
United States
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, New York, 10461
United States
New York-Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10032
United States

Collaborators and Investigators

Sponsor: Columbia University

  • Jason Adelman, MD, MS, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, Columbia University

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

Study Start Date2022-03-16
Study Completion Date2028-06-30

Study Record Updates

Study Start Date2022-03-16
Study Completion Date2028-06-30

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

  • Medical Errors
  • Electronic Medical Records