VETERANS ONLY. Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is common. Most Americans will have at least one episode of low back pain in their lifetimes. Approximately 50% of all US Veterans have chronic pain, and CLBP is the most common type of pain in this population. This study will use a sequential randomized, pragmatic, 2-step comparative effectiveness study design. The main goal is to identify the best approach for treating cLBP using commonly recommended non-surgical and non-pharmacological options. The first step compares continued care and active monitoring (CCAM) to internet-based pain self-management (Pain EASE) and an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines Pain EASE with tailored exercise and physical activity. Patients who do not have a significant decrease in pain interference (a functional outcome) in Step 1 and those desiring additional treatment will be randomized in Step 2 to yoga, spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), or therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants proceeding to randomization in Step 2 will be allowed to exclude up to one of the three Step 2 treatments based on their preferences. The investigators' primary hypothesis for the first treatment step is that an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines pain self-management education with a tailored exercise program will reduce pain interference greater than internet-based pain self-management alone or CCAM in Veterans with cLBP. The primary outcome is change in pain interference at 3 months, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. Study participants will be followed for one year after initiation of their final study treatments to assess the durability of treatment effects. The study plans to randomize 2529 patients across 20 centers.
Chronic Low Back Pain
VETERANS ONLY. Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is common. Most Americans will have at least one episode of low back pain in their lifetimes. Approximately 50% of all US Veterans have chronic pain, and CLBP is the most common type of pain in this population. This study will use a sequential randomized, pragmatic, 2-step comparative effectiveness study design. The main goal is to identify the best approach for treating cLBP using commonly recommended non-surgical and non-pharmacological options. The first step compares continued care and active monitoring (CCAM) to internet-based pain self-management (Pain EASE) and an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines Pain EASE with tailored exercise and physical activity. Patients who do not have a significant decrease in pain interference (a functional outcome) in Step 1 and those desiring additional treatment will be randomized in Step 2 to yoga, spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), or therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants proceeding to randomization in Step 2 will be allowed to exclude up to one of the three Step 2 treatments based on their preferences. The investigators' primary hypothesis for the first treatment step is that an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines pain self-management education with a tailored exercise program will reduce pain interference greater than internet-based pain self-management alone or CCAM in Veterans with cLBP. The primary outcome is change in pain interference at 3 months, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. Study participants will be followed for one year after initiation of their final study treatments to assess the durability of treatment effects. The study plans to randomize 2529 patients across 20 centers.
Sequential and Comparative Evaluation of Pain Treatment Effectiveness Response
-
Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, Loma Linda, California, United States, 92357
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, Long Beach, California, United States, 90822
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1207
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
Bay Pines VA Healthcare System, Pay Pines, FL, Bay Pines, Florida, United States, 33744-0000
Orlando VA Medical Center, Orlando, FL, Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA, Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2803
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.
to
ALL
No
VA Office of Research and Development,
David J Clark, PhD MD, STUDY_CHAIR, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Matthew J. Bair, MD MS, STUDY_CHAIR, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
2026-06-17