Reactive Balance Training for Fall Prevention

Description

The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate and compare the effect of three different perturbation based training devices on the reactive balance control among healthy young adults, healthy older adults, and neurologically impaired stroke individuals. Furthermore, the project aims to determine the feasibility and tolerability of 30-minutes of perturbation training using the SureFooted Trainer. Overall, the project directs to find out the long term effect of training on fall risk reduction and fall prevention. This study investigates the effects of perturbation training (slip and trip) based on the principles of motor learning. Perturbations in the form of slips and trips induced by the three different types of perturbation devices will displace the center of mass outside the base of support and challenge the stability, thereby inducing a fall and demand compensatory strategies in order to prevent it. Such perturbation training would train the motor system to improve stability control and vertical limb support. The project design aims to examine the ability of the central nervous system to mitigate the interference in stability control (if any) that is induced by opposing types of perturbations. The hypothesis of this study if supported by the results, will provide the difference in motor learning with training on three different perturbation devices. Furthermore, it would help to determine which of the three training devices is the most effective in developing defense mechanisms necessary to reduce fall-risk among community-living older adults and the neurological population.

Conditions

Healthy Young, Healthy Aging, Stroke

Study Overview

Study Details

Study overview

The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate and compare the effect of three different perturbation based training devices on the reactive balance control among healthy young adults, healthy older adults, and neurologically impaired stroke individuals. Furthermore, the project aims to determine the feasibility and tolerability of 30-minutes of perturbation training using the SureFooted Trainer. Overall, the project directs to find out the long term effect of training on fall risk reduction and fall prevention. This study investigates the effects of perturbation training (slip and trip) based on the principles of motor learning. Perturbations in the form of slips and trips induced by the three different types of perturbation devices will displace the center of mass outside the base of support and challenge the stability, thereby inducing a fall and demand compensatory strategies in order to prevent it. Such perturbation training would train the motor system to improve stability control and vertical limb support. The project design aims to examine the ability of the central nervous system to mitigate the interference in stability control (if any) that is induced by opposing types of perturbations. The hypothesis of this study if supported by the results, will provide the difference in motor learning with training on three different perturbation devices. Furthermore, it would help to determine which of the three training devices is the most effective in developing defense mechanisms necessary to reduce fall-risk among community-living older adults and the neurological population.

Reactive Balance Training for Fall Prevention: a Comparative Study of Three Different Perturbation Devices

Reactive Balance Training for Fall Prevention

Condition
Healthy Young
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Chicago

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

  • * Age group: 18-55 years.
  • * Absence of any acute or chronic neurological, cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal or systemic diagnosis.
  • * No recent major surgery (\< 6 months) or hospitalization (\< 3 months)
  • * Not on any sedative drugs.
  • * Can understand and communicate in English
  • * Age group: 56-90 years.
  • * Absence of any acute or chronic neurological, cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal or systemic diagnosis.
  • * No recent major surgery (\< 6 months) or hospitalization (\< 3 months)
  • * Not on any sedative drugs.
  • * Ability to walk with or without an assistive device for 10 meters
  • * Can understand and communicate in English
  • * Berg balance scale score \<45/56.
  • * Age group: 18-90 years.
  • * Absence of any acute or chronic neurological diagnosis except stroke (self reported)
  • * Onset of stroke (\> 6 months)
  • * Absence of any cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal or systemic diagnosis.
  • * No recent major surgery (\< 6 months) or hospitalization (\< 3 months)
  • * Not on any sedative drugs.
  • * Ability to walk with or without an assistive device for 10 meters
  • * Can understand and communicate in English
  • * Subjects will not proceed with the test if any of the following occurs at baseline measurement: 1) HR \> 85% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HRmax) (HRmax = 220 - age), 2) systolic blood pressure (SBP) \> 165 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \> 110 mmHg during resting), and 3) oxygen saturation (measured by pulse oximeter) during resting \< 95%.
  • * Body weight more than 250 lbs.
  • * Individuals with heel bone density with a T-score \< -2, is classified as osteoporotic and will be excluded.
  • * Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (Mini-mental State Exam score \< 25/30) will be excluded.
  • * Subjects will not proceed with the test if any of the following occurs at baseline measurement: 1) HR \> 85% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HRmax) (HRmax = 220 - age), 2) systolic blood pressure (SBP) \> 165 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \> 110 mmHg during resting), and 3) oxygen saturation (measured by pulse oximeter) during resting \< 95%.
  • * 6 minute walk test. Subjects will also be screened out if on the 6 minute walk test they complain of shortness of breath or uncontrolled pain (\> 3/10 on VAS) or pulse oxygen drops \< 92% or are unable to achieve the age-specified minimal ambulation distance.
  • * Body weight more than 250 lbs.
  • * Individuals with heel bone density with a T-score \< -2, is classified as osteoporotic and will be excluded.
  • * Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (Mini-mental State Exam score \< 25/30) will be excluded.
  • * Subjects will not proceed with the test if any of the following occurs at baseline measurement: 1) HR \> 85% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HRmax) (HRmax = 220 - age), 2) systolic blood pressure (SBP) \> 165 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \> 110 mmHg during resting), and 3) oxygen saturation (measured by pulse oximeter) during resting \< 95%.
  • * 6 minute walk test. Subjects will also be screened out if on the 6 minute walk test they complain of shortness of breath or uncontrolled pain (\> 3/10 on VAS) or pulse oxygen drops \< 92% or are unable to achieve the age-specified minimal ambulation distance.
  • * Body weight more than 250 lbs.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 Years to 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Collaborators and Investigators

University of Illinois at Chicago,

Tanvi Bhatt, PhD, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, University of Illinois at Chicago

Study Record Dates

2025-12-31