Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

Description

The study aims to compare between early versus delayed urinary catheter removal the impact on time to ambulation (in minutes) after minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery

Conditions

Foley Catheterization, Ambulation

Talk to us

Study Overview

On this page

Study Details

Study overview

The study aims to compare between early versus delayed urinary catheter removal the impact on time to ambulation (in minutes) after minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery

Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: a Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial

Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

Condition
Foley Catheterization
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Kansas City

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

  • * Patients aged 18 years and older
  • * Minimally invasive one- or two-level lumbar fusion procedures
  • * Patients that cannot give consent
  • * Patients with lower extremity amputation(s);
  • * Non-minimally invasive surgeries
  • * Patients with pre-existing bladder/kidney or urinary tract dysfunction
  • * Patients with spinal cord injuries
  • * Patients with known lower extremity weakness and impaired mobility.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 Years to

Sexes Eligible for Study

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Collaborators and Investigators

University of Kansas Medical Center,

Brandon Carlson, MD, MPH, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, University of Kansas Medical Center

Study Record Dates

2026-02