The primary objective of this study is to examine the optimization of Reverse Shouder Arthroplasty implant position between GPS and conventional techniques. The secondary objective is to assess the effect of implant position using GPS vs. conventional techniques on ROM and patient reported outcomes. Long-term follow-up to 10 years with minimum 2 year follow-up for patients.
Technology, Comparison
The primary objective of this study is to examine the optimization of Reverse Shouder Arthroplasty implant position between GPS and conventional techniques. The secondary objective is to assess the effect of implant position using GPS vs. conventional techniques on ROM and patient reported outcomes. Long-term follow-up to 10 years with minimum 2 year follow-up for patients.
Comparison Between Exactech Guided Personalized Surgery (GPS) and Conventional Instrumentation of Shoulder Arthroplasty
-
Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), New York, New York, United States, 10021
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.
21 Years to
ALL
No
Exactech,
Lawrence Gulotta, MD, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Brian Werner, MD, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, University of Virginia
2031-09-30