Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Description

The Beads vs Vac trial is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of 312 participants with a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive either an antibiotic bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for their temporary open fracture wound management. Outcomes will be assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status six months after randomization. Components of the composite outcome will be hierarchically assessed in the following order: 1) all-cause mortality, 2) injury-related amputation of the lower extremity, 3) unplanned reoperation to manage wound complications, infection, or delayed fracture healing, and 4) clinical fracture healing as assessed using the Functional IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) instrument. The secondary outcomes will independently assess the four components of the primary outcome. This is a Phase III trial.

Conditions

Open Tíbia Fracture

Study Overview

Study Details

Study overview

The Beads vs Vac trial is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of 312 participants with a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive either an antibiotic bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for their temporary open fracture wound management. Outcomes will be assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status six months after randomization. Components of the composite outcome will be hierarchically assessed in the following order: 1) all-cause mortality, 2) injury-related amputation of the lower extremity, 3) unplanned reoperation to manage wound complications, infection, or delayed fracture healing, and 4) clinical fracture healing as assessed using the Functional IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) instrument. The secondary outcomes will independently assess the four components of the primary outcome. This is a Phase III trial.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Management of Severe Open Tibia Fracture Wounds

Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Condition
Open Tíbia Fracture
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Los Angeles

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033

Gainesville

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611

Miami

University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States, 33146

Indianapolis

Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202

Baltimore

University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201

Largo

University of Maryland Capital Region Health, Largo, Maryland, United States, 20774

University

University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States, 38677

Lincoln

Bryan Medical Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68506

Lebanon

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766

Cincinnati

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study

    18 Years to

    Sexes Eligible for Study

    ALL

    Accepts Healthy Volunteers

    No

    Collaborators and Investigators

    University of Maryland, Baltimore,

    Study Record Dates

    2025-10-01