This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.
This study is open to adults with advanced pancreatic cancer. The study tests a type of immunotherapy. It is a protein treatment combined with a virus that may kill cancer cells and help the immune system fight cancer. The immunotherapy is combined with a study medicine called ezabenlimab. Ezabenlimab is an antibody that may also help the immune system fight cancer. The purpose is to find the highest dose of the immunotherapy that people with pancreatic cancer can tolerate when taken alone or together with ezabenlimab (Part A and B). To find out, researchers look at the number of participants with certain severe health problems. The purpose of Part C is to check whether the immunotherapy combined with ezabenlimab may increase survival. Participants are put randomly into 2 groups. One group receives the immunotherapy combined with ezabenlimab and the other group receives standard treatment. Researchers compare the results between the groups. Participants can stay in the study as long as they tolerate the treatment or up to 1 year. During that time, they regularly visit the site. At all visits, the doctors closely check the health of the participants and note any severe health problems.
A Phase 1b Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of a Heterologous Prime Boost Vaccination (ATP150/ATP152/ATP162, VSV-GP154) and Ezabenlimab (BI 754091) in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
Sponsor: Boehringer Ingelheim
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.