Precision Ventilation vs Standard Care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Description

The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Failure

Study Overview

Study Details

Study overview

The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.

PREcision VENTilation to Attenuate Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Precision Ventilation vs Standard Care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Condition
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Boston

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215

New York

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States, 10032

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

  • 1. Age ≥ 18 years
  • 2. Moderate or severe ARDS, defined as meeting all of the following (a-e):
  • 1. Invasive ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 5 cm H2O
  • 2. Hypoxemia as characterized by: If arterial blood gas (ABG) available: the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2)/FiO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg, or, if ABG not available OR overt clinical deterioration in oxygenation since last ABG: SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 235 with SpO2 ≤ 97% (both conditions) on two representative assessments between 1 to 6 hours apart
  • 3. Bilateral lung opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by effusions, lobar collapse, or nodules
  • 4. Respiratory failure not fully explained by heart failure or fluid overload
  • 5. Onset within 1 week of clinical insult or new/worsening symptoms
  • 3. Early in ARDS course
  • * Within 48 hours since meeting last moderate-severe ARDS criterion (#2 above)
  • * Current invasive ventilation episode not more than 4 days duration
  • * Current severe hypoxemic episode (receipt of invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula) not more than 10 days duration
  • 1. Esophageal manometry used clinically
  • 2. Severe brain injury: including suspected elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, or Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤ 8 directly caused by severe brain injury (e.g., ischemia/hemorrhage).
  • 3. Gross barotrauma or chest tube inserted to treat barotrauma
  • 4. Esophageal varix or stricture; recent oropharyngeal or gastroesophageal surgery; or past esophagectomy
  • 5. Severe coagulopathy (platelet \< 5000/µL or international normalized ratio \[INR\] \> 4)
  • 6. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or carbon dioxide (CO2) removal
  • 7. Neuromuscular disease that impairs spontaneous breathing (including but not limited to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, spinal cord injury at C5 or above)
  • 8. Chronic supplemental oxygen, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung transplant
  • 9. Refractory shock: norepinephrine-equivalent dose ≥ 0.4 µg/kg/min or simultaneous receipt of ≥ 3 vasopressors
  • 10. Severe liver disease, defined as Child-Pugh Class C
  • 11. ICU admission for burn injury
  • 12. Current ICU stay \> 2 weeks or hospital stay (including subacute hospitalization) \> 4 weeks
  • 13. Estimated mortality \> 50% over 6 months due to underlying chronic medical condition as assessed by the study physician
  • 14. Moribund patient not expected to survive 24 hours as assessed by the study physician; if cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided, assessment for moribund status must occur at least 6 hours after CPR was completed
  • 15. Limitation on life-sustaining care, other than do-not-resuscitate, or expectation by treating clinical team that a limitation on life-sustained care will be adopted within next 24 hours.
  • 16. Treating clinician refusal
  • 17. Prisoner

Ages Eligible for Study

18 Years to

Sexes Eligible for Study

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Collaborators and Investigators

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,

Daniel Talmor, MD MPH, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Study Record Dates

2030-08-31