Traction vs. No Traction in Colonic ESD

Description

The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center is to compare the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of using a traction device in colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to those of using conventional ESD. The investigators of this study hypothesize that use of the traction device will help expedite colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections.

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Neoplasm

Talk to us

Study Overview

On this page

Study Details

Study overview

The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center is to compare the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of using a traction device in colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to those of using conventional ESD. The investigators of this study hypothesize that use of the traction device will help expedite colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Using a Traction Device in Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Conventional ESD: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Traction vs. No Traction in Colonic ESD

Condition
Gastrointestinal Neoplasm
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Houston

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States, 77030

Houston

Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center (BSLMC), Houston, Texas, United States, 77030

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

  • 1. Patient is ≥ 18 years old.
  • 2. Patients can provide informed consent.
  • 3. Patient is referred for ESD procedure of colonic neoplastic lesions and with one of the following criteria:
  • 1. Patient is \< 18 years old.
  • 2. Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent.
  • 3. Patient is a pregnant woman.
  • 4. Lesions with morphology: pedunculated type (Paris IP, Ips).
  • 5. Appendiceal orifice or IC valve lesions. 6. Patients with lesions removed with other techniques besides ESD (like hybrid ESD or submucosal tunneling technique STER and EMR).

Ages Eligible for Study

18 Years to

Sexes Eligible for Study

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Collaborators and Investigators

Baylor College of Medicine,

Mohamed Othman, MD, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, Baylor College of Medicine

Study Record Dates

2026-06-30