A prospective, multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) hemostatic powder versus conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients presenting with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding which is found at endoscopy to be due to a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel.
Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
A prospective, multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) hemostatic powder versus conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients presenting with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding which is found at endoscopy to be due to a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel.
Randomized Trial of UI-EWD vs. Conventional Endoscopic Therapy for Bleeding Ulcers
-
University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
Yale, New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
RUSH University, Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States, 08901
Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
NYU Langone, New York, New York, United States, 10016
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.
22 Years to
ALL
No
Medtronic - MITG,
Loren Laine, MD, STUDY_CHAIR, Yale School of Medicine
2026-08