The purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tulisokibart in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Study 1's primary hypotheses are that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (\<150, US/FDA) or per stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 52 (US/FDA and EU/EMA), and that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (\<150, US/FDA) or per stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 12 (US/FDA and EU/EMA). Study 2's primary hypothesis is that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (\<150, US/FDA) or stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 12 (US/FDA and EU/EMA).
Crohn's Disease
The purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tulisokibart in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Study 1's primary hypotheses are that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (\<150, US/FDA) or per stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 52 (US/FDA and EU/EMA), and that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (\<150, US/FDA) or per stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 12 (US/FDA and EU/EMA). Study 2's primary hypothesis is that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (\<150, US/FDA) or stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 12 (US/FDA and EU/EMA).
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tulisokibart (MK-7240) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (MK-7240-008)
-
Digestive Health Specialists ( Site 5064), Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36301
Om Research LLC ( Site 5045), Camarillo, California, United States, 93012
Southern California Research Center ( Site 5044), Coronado, California, United States, 92118
Om Research LLC ( Site 5038), Lancaster, California, United States, 93534
Clinnova Research - Orange ( Site 5110), Orange, California, United States, 92868
Amicis Research Center - Valencia ( Site 5055), Valencia, California, United States, 91355
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus-Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ( Site 50, Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
Peak Gastroenterology Associates ( Site 5023), Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
Medical Research Center of Connecticut ( Site 5005), Hamden, Connecticut, United States, 06518
Emerson Clinical Research Institute ( Site 5051), Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20009
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.
16 Years to 80 Years
ALL
No
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC,
Medical Director, STUDY_DIRECTOR, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
2029-11-12