The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bomedemstat compared with hydroxyurea in cytoreductive therapy naïve essential thrombocythemia (ET) participants for whom cytoreductive therapy is indicated. Its primary objective is to compare bomedemstat to hydroxyurea with respect to durable clinicohematologic response (DCHR). The primary hypothesis is that bomedemstat is superior to hydroxyurea with respect to DCHR.
Essential Thrombocythemia
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bomedemstat compared with hydroxyurea in cytoreductive therapy naïve essential thrombocythemia (ET) participants for whom cytoreductive therapy is indicated. Its primary objective is to compare bomedemstat to hydroxyurea with respect to durable clinicohematologic response (DCHR). The primary hypothesis is that bomedemstat is superior to hydroxyurea with respect to DCHR.
Bomedemstat vs Hydroxyurea for Essential Thrombocythemia (MK-3543-007)
-
Parkview Research Center at Parkview Regional Medical Center ( Site 0006), Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46845
Duke University Health System (DUHS) ( Site 0012), Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.
18 Years to
ALL
No
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC,
Medical Director, STUDY_DIRECTOR, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
2029-04-15