This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate both the technical success and efficacy of using the LOBO™ device in patients undergoing embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations (PAVM). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: * What is the technical success rate, the number of LOBO™ devices needed for occlusion, and time to occlusion for each feeding artery during PAVM embolization using the LOBO™ device? * What is the short-term occlusion rate of the LOBO™ device for PAVM embolization (6 months post-embolization)? * What are the medium- and long-term occlusion rate of the LOBO™ device in PAVMs (12 months and 36 months post embolization)? Researchers will compare the percentage of LOBO™ embolized PAVMs that develop recanalization at 6, 12, and 36- month intervals compared to percentage of conventionally embolized PAVMs that develop recanalization at the same intervals. Participants will undergo the embolization procedure and be followed for 36 months after the procedure. There will be a total of 4 study visits: * Treatment visit * 6-Month Follow-up visit * 12-Month Follow-up visit * 36-Month Follow-up visit At each clinical follow-up visit participants will undergo imaging with a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest.
Efficacy & Safety of LOBO™ Vascular Occlusion Device for Embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations (PAVM)
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
Sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.