RECRUITING

Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube

Description

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Study Overview

Study Details

Study overview

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Comparison of Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube to no Endotracheal Tube in EBUS-TBNA Procedure Under Moderate Sedation

Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube

Condition
Multiple Pulmonary Diseases
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Minneapolis

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

  • * Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure
  • * Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy

Ages Eligible for Study

18 Years to

Sexes Eligible for Study

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Collaborators and Investigators

University of Minnesota,

H. Erhan Dincer, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, University of Minnesota

Study Record Dates

2027-03-31