This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a cancer survivor program, delivered via Cooperative Extension, is feasible and if it can improve health outcomes in cancer survivors who are post-active treatment. Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of SUCCESS. Hypothesis 1: SUCCESS will be feasible and acceptable as evidenced by delivery of the intervention among Educators (implementation), including in agreement with the curriculum in Phase 1 (fidelity) with \>85% attendance (demand) among participants with \>80% rating the intervention as acceptable or highly acceptable on 5-point Likert-type scale (acceptability). Aim 2: Determine the preliminary efficacy of SUCCESS for improving HRQOL (primary outcome) and other psychosocial and health-related endpoints (e.g., financial toxicity) (secondary outcomes). Hypothesis 2: Compared to matched controls, adults LWBC who complete SUCCESS will have significant improvements in HRQOL per the PROMIS Global Health v1.2 at follow-up (i.e., after 6 weeks). Aim 3: Examine changes in conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) gene expression in a subset of interventions participants at follow-up. Hypothesis 3: Adults LWBC who complete SUCCESS will experience significant CTRA down-regulation. This is a single arm trial and there is no comparison group. Participants will be asked to do survey- and Zoom-based data collection before and after completing the 6-week program.
Cooperative Extension and Cancer Survivorship: Supportive Care Via Cooperative Extension Services (SUCCESS)
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
Sponsor: University of Oklahoma
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.