This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.
The primary objective of this study is to learn whether a morning dose of extended-release torsemide enhances renal sodium excretion after lunch (4-8 hours after dosing) compared to immediate-release torsemide. This is a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in patients with heart failure who are on a stable dose of a loop diuretic. During the study period, participants' current loop diuretics will be replaced with an equivalent dose of either immediate-release or extended-release torsemide. Following a one-week stabilization period on the assigned torsemide formulation, patients will report to the clinical site for an assessment visit. On the study day, patients will take a single dose of the same torsemide formulation they have been on for the past week, administered after breakfast. Urine samples be collected are: * 0-4 hours post-dosing (pre-lunch period) * 4-8 hours post-dosing (post-lunch period) * 8-24 hours post-dosing (24 hours period) The primary endpoint will be urinary sodium excretion (4-8 hours after dosing). This will be compared between the extended-release arm and the immediate-release arm to assess the efficacy of prolonged diuretic action. In addition, urinary potassium and creatinine excretion and creatinine clearance will be measured in all urine samples as the safety endpoints.
A Randomized, Two-Period, Two-Arm, Double-Dummy, Crossover Study to Compare Natriuretic Effects of Extended Release Torsemide to Immediate Release Torsemide in Patients With Heart Failure (NEXT-HF)
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
Sponsor: Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.