This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.
Myofascial Pelvic Pain (MPP) is an often-misdiagnosed condition affecting up to 26% of women during their lives and imposing enormous costs on national health care systems. It frequently involves comorbidities such as bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. There are no quantitative measures that adequately guide the physician and accurate diagnosis typically requires an internal examination by a tertiary specialist. This study will develop and test an instrument to establish a normal range for near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) optical changes associate with pelvic floor exercise in adult women based on the test-to test (intra-day) reliability of oxygen kinetics related to contraction of the pelvic floor muscle. We will establish the relationship between the quantitative NIRS data, the condition of Myofascial pelvic musculature and the symptomatology of MPP and related comorbidities. We will also evaluate prospectively the effectiveness of these data in predicting effective treatment modalities. Finally, we will optimize a training regime for non-specialists to allow this technique to be used in a variety of settings. The development of this device and validation of its relevance to diagnosis and treatment of MPP will provide effective care sooner and at a lower cost than current procedures. It will also reduce inequities in the availability of care to underserved populations by providing an inexpensive, reliable and easily available method for a variety of providers to address MPP.
Quantitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Muscle Fitness in Myofascial Pelvic Pain
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
Sponsor: University of California, Los Angeles
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.