147 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Below-the-Knee Interventions for Limb Salvage: Use of Multifunctional Angioplasty Balloon Catheters ("BTK Multicath Registry") A non-randomized clinical registry This study is designed to obtain preliminary data on clinically relevant procedural variables during percutaneous below-knee artery revascularization procedures among consecutive patients treated with either the Finesse BTK Multicath® ("Finesse") or the standard of care using conventional angioplasty balloon catheters. This registry will enroll participants with a history of chronic limb threatening ischemia and below-knee arterial insufficiency who will be assigned to revascularization with or without use of the Finesse BTK Multicath. The registry is an acute study examining procedural data only. The primary endpoints of interest are the volume of contrast used for the intervention, overall procedure time, radiation dose, number of catheter exchanges during revascularization, and medical device supply costs. For the first phase 12 consecutive patients will be treated with the standard of care. For the second phase 12 consecutive patients will be treated with Finesse. 24 participants total Up to 5 study sites in the United States Initial anticipated enrollment: Q4 2024 Last anticipated enrollment: Q2 2025 Patients \>=18 years old with documented history of unilateral chronic limb threatening ischemia due to below-knee arterial insufficiency with angiographic runoff in the foot and limited arterial insufficiency above the knee 1. Contrast volume administered during the revascularization portion of a procedure. 2. Number of catheter exchanges during revascularization 3. Fluoroscopy time 4. Radiation dose during revascularization 5. Procedure time post-enrollment 6. Equipment costs 7. Reduced use of supplies 8. Technical success 9. Safety/Major Adverse Peripheral Events On-treatment sample Intention-to-treat
This is a Pivotal, Prospective, randomised, two arm, placebo controlled, single-blind, multicentre trial that will be conducted at approximately 70 sites; approx. 40 sites with at least 50% of subjects will be recruited from USA and approx. 30 sites OUS - Singapore, Australia and Japan. Each site will be capped at 30 maximum subjects recruited. The main goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus drug coated balloon (DCB) versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of below the knee arterial disease. Eligible subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation ratio and stratified by recruiting countries. Each subject will be randomized to receive either: 1. MagicTouch PTA sirolimus coated balloon catheter (DCB) in addition to standard balloon angioplasty or 2. Placebo balloon angioplasty in addition to standard balloon angioplasty (PTA).
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for treating lesions located in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries (SFA/PPA). Long Balloon substudy: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon in the 120, 150 and 200 mm lengths for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions.
This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, non-blinded study designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Tack Endovascular System in the Mid/Distal Popliteal, Tibial, and Peroneal Arteries ranging in diameter from 1.5mm to 4.5mm for the treatment of post percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) dissection(s) requiring repair.
This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, non-blinded study designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Tack Endovascular System in subjects with post-balloon angioplasty (post-PTA) dissection(s) type(s) A through F in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries ranging in diameter from 2.5mm to 6.0mm.
The purpose of this study is to determine if it is safe and feasible to apply PRT-201 to the adventitia of arteries following successful angioplasty (PTA).
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare clinical improvement, cost effectiveness and patency rates between new and improved Nitinol stents and open bypass surgery in the superficial femoral artery disease. Secondary outcomes also include comparing quality of life, re-intervention rate, mortality, morbidity and time to return to work or regular activities. Patients with superficial femoral artery lesions will be considered. Patients with TASC II A lesions will not be randomized but treated with PTA/stenting as standard of care. Patients with TASC II B and C lesions will be prospectively randomized into either receiving open bypass or stenting. Patients with TASC D lesions will be treated with open bypass surgery after angiography. The investigators will collect pre-procedure, peri-procedural and clinical follow-up data on all enrolled the patients.
The reason the investigators are doing this study is to compare the results of laser atherectomy versus angioplasty with or without the placement of a stent in the artery. A stent is a metal tube used to open up narrow arteries in the body.
The study is being done to determine if venous angioplasty is an effective treatment for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI). In this condition, areas of narrowing or blockages are present in the internal jugular or azygos veins (veins which drain blood from the central nervous system) and these blockages may be associated with symptoms classically attributed to MS. Therefore, angioplasty may help to improve the symptoms associated with CCSVI and multiple sclerosis (MS). In this study, the investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of angioplasty in the treatment of CCSVI by comparing two the outcomes of two groups of patients: one group with CCSVI diagnosed on a venogram and treated with angioplasty and one group with CCSVI diagnosed on a venogram but not treated. The patients enrolled in this study, and the neurologist evaluating patients after the procedure, will not know whether or not they were treated with angioplasty.
Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. The reason for this is that there is a risk that angioplasty can cause injury to the heart artery that might require open heart surgery to fix. Open heart surgery is a backup in case it is needed. The risk that open heart surgery will be needed is very small. Nevertheless, without more research, many state Departments of Health and all national heart organizations do not want to change the requirement for having on-site open heart surgery wherever angioplasty is performed. Some States already allow this; and European heart organizations already allow it, as well. This study is designed to determine whether the safety and benefits of angioplasty are the same at hospitals that perform angioplasty either with or without open heart surgery backup. Patient who enter the study have a heart catheterization at a hospital without a heart surgery program. If they need angioplasty, then they are randomized to either stay at the hospital without heart surgery for their angioplasty or to be transferred for the procedure to a hospital with heart surgery. For every four patients, three stay at the hospital without heart surgery and one is transferred. The study is designed to show that there is no detectable difference between the safety and benefits of the procedure at the two types of hospital (with and without heart surgery). The cost of the procedure at the two hospital types is also compared.
Arteriovenous grafts are used as the vascular access in 40-50% of hemodialysis patients. Grafts are prone to recurrent stenosis (narrowing) and thrombosis (clotting). Graft clotting is usually due to a narrowing at the site where the graft joins the vein. The standard treatment is to remove the clot and angioplasty the narrowed area. The long-term outcome is not good, lasting only about 1 month. Placing a stent (a small metallic, PTFE covered, spring) at the narrowed site may keep the graft open longer. Principal investigator's preliminary research data suggest that placing a stent at the stenotic site prolongs graft patency following thrombectomy, as compared to conventional angioplasty. This is a single-center, randomized clinical trial, in which patients with a clotted graft with underlying stenosis at the venous anastomosis of the graft will be allocated to thrombectomy + angioplasty (control group) or to thrombectomy + stent placement (study group). The primary endpoint will be primary (unassisted) graft patency. The secondary endpoints will be secondary (assisted) graft patency and overall access-related costs.
The purpose of the Metricath Gemini System is to pre-dilate the target treatment area, take arterial lumen measurements in a native section of artery or within the deployed stent and perform further dilation of the deployed stent if required. In this manner, the Metricath Gemini System can assist the Interventionalist by providing arterial measurements prior to stenting, performing pre-stenting angioplasty, taking within stent measurements to help determine if the stent is fully deployed, and by performing post-stenting dilations to further dilate the stent if required.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, multi-center study designed to compare differences in rates of myonecrosis (measured as an elevation of CK-MB ratio ≥ 2 times ULN) within 24 hours following low-medium risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in aspirin or clopidogrel non-responsive patients who are randomized to heparin with or without eptifibatide therapy during PCI. The primary objective of this study is to determine if the use of eptifibatide is associated with a significant difference in post-PCI myonecrosis (measured as an elevation of CK-MB ratio ≥ 2 times upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) within 24 hours of low-medium risk PCI in patients who are aspirin or non-responsive as determined by VerifyNow Aspirin and P2Y12 testing.
The objective of this randomized trials is to evaluate, among coronary artery disease patients who have just had either angioplasty or stents, whether a novel intervention based on feedback of individualized risk profiles framed as the opportunity to reduce one's biological age is more effective after two years in reducing mortality and major cardiovascular morbidity (specifically, myocardial infarction, stroke, class II-IV angina, and severe ischemia) than the standard risk reduction approach, which is framed as one's opportunity to reduce future risk. The novel strategy is based on the theory of net-present value and is tested in coronary artery disease patients who have a high risk of adverse outcomes by two years.
We are interested in achieving an empirical test of the two intervention approaches under study. Specifically, we seek to determine the potential differential impact of positive affect induction and self affirmation following the qualitative study phase.
To explore and illuminate the cultural, social, and psychological factors that either facilitate or serve as barriers to behavioral change in angioplasty patients. Through a series of open-ended questions we will explore and build a better understanding of how culturally different patient groups perceive heart disease and the difficulties in changing health behavior. In addition, we hope to better understand and anticipate barriers and issues that participants face in successfully changing their behaviors.
TG100-115 is able to reduce the size of heart attacks in pre-clinical models. The hypothesis of this study is that TG100-115 can be given safely to patients who suffer a heart attack and undergo angioplasty to restore blood flow. We will also evaluate whether TG100-115 reduces heart muscle damage.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Auryon Atherectomy System with balloon angioplasty safe and effective in treating lower limb blockages. The main question it aims to answer is: Is treatment with Auryon Atherectomy System more effective than angioplasty alone in preventing death, amputation, revascularization and improving patency? Researchers will compare the Auryon Atherectomy System with balloon angioplasty to balloon angioplasty alone.
The objective of this post-market clinical study is to obtain additional data on the safety and performance of the All'InCath 035M Balloon Dilatation Catheter when used per its Instructions for Use (IFU) during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedures in clinical practice.
To compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a Dapagliflozin treated group versus a group managed with the usual standard of care.
The objective of this study is to obtain outcomes following dissection repair with the Tack Endovascular System in a broad population of patients undergoing endovascular treatment of lesions within the superficial femoral, popliteal, peroneal, and/or tibial arteries.
A prospective, multi-center, randomized (1:1) clinical study evaluating the FLEX Vessel Prep device plus percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) (study arm) vs PTA alone (control arm) for the treatment of obstructive lesions in the native arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.
By assessing the safety and durability of an endovascular intervention, this study will justify and inform the design of a subsequent seamless feasibility/pivotal trial aimed at the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), an entity which carries a high risk of stroke despite existing medical therapies, and has no other treatment options. Given the global burden of ICAS as a leading cause of stroke, there is a high potential for public health impact not just in the U.S., but world-wide.
This is an open label study of Riociguat in patients with continued exercise intolerance at least 6 months following pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA).
A prospective, multicenter, randomized study evaluating the use of Jetstream Atherectomy (JS) followed by DCB in comparison to the use of plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) followed by DCB alone in the treatment of complex lesions in femoropopliteal arteries in subjects with claudication (Rutherford Clinical Category (RCC) of 2-4) (complex lesions are defined as long (≥ 10 cm) lesions, or moderately or highly calcified lesions, or chronic total occlusions irrespective of length).
The purpose is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Stellarex DCB for the treatment of stenosis or occlusions of below-the-knee arteries.
This trial will evaluate Orbital Atherectomy compared to conventional balloon angioplasty technique for the treatment of severely calcified lesions prior to implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES).
The narrowing of Dialysis Fistulae or Grafts is a near universal problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and requires patients to undergo repeated angioplasty or mechanical opening of the fistula.
The research study is designed to assess the technical feasibility and safety of a perivascular injection of vonapanitase delivered via micro-infusion catheter to the distal popliteal, tibial or peroneal arteries immediately following successful angioplasty.
The use of drug coated balloon (DCB) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and tissue loss has recently raised some concerns after the IN.PACT deep trial using paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty in the tibial arteries was terminated. The investigators objective is to establish the safety and efficacy of drug coated balloon (DCB) for femoropopliteal occlusive disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and tissue loss. The investigators objective is to establish the safety and efficacy of drug coated balloon (DCB) for femoropopliteal occlusive disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and tissue loss.