165 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if backup pacing at an increased rate improves hemodynamics in adults with relative bradycardia, a permanent pacemaker, and cardiogenic shock. The main question it aims to answer is: Does increasing the backup pacing rate to 100 beats per minute lead to improved cardiac index compared to a backup pacing rate of 75 beats per minute Participants who are already hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit with a permanent pacemaker and pulmonary artery catheter in place will be enrolled in this study. Participants will be exposed to each pacemaker rate in a randomized order with hemodynamics assessed after 10 minutes at each rate.
Prospective, multi-center, single arm, post approval study to be conducted in the United States.
The purpose of this study is to explore if there is a less harmful way to pace patients with first-degree AV-block to ensure that the negative effects inferred by the pacing do not outweigh the positive effects of AV-synchrony. The main hypothesis of the study is that His-bundle pacing will offer a more physiological mode of pacing in patients with first-degree AV-block than conventional pacing. Patients scheduled for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in sinus rhythm, with first degree AV-block, normal QRS duration less than 120 ms and normal left ventricular ejection fraction will be included. During the AF ablation three different pacing modes (atrial, AV-synchronous and His-bundle pacing) at two different rates (5 to10 bpm above the basal rate and at 100 bpm) will be performed and evaluated using echocardiography. After the completion of all six pacing protocols (i.e., three modes at two different rates) the experimental part of the procedure ends. The primary end-point will be echocardiographic evidence of dyssynchrony. Secondary end-points will include left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volume, mitral regurgitation, septal to posterior wall motion delay and inter-ventricular wall motion delay. Since the research study is conducted in parallel with the standard catheter ablation, we do not anticipate any additional side effects as a result of the study.
This study evaluates the impact of a new pacing mode avoiding unnecessary ventricular stimulation in combination with advanced dual chamber detection with slow VT management on the clinical outcome for hospitalization and mortality and inadequate therapy in medically stable, ICD-indicated patients with impaired left ventricular function (LVEF ≤ 40%) who do not have pacing indications and no indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). It compares a new pacing mode avoiding ventricular stimulation when not needed combined with dual chamber detection with a pure ventricular back up pacing and single chamber detection criteria with pure ventricular back up pacing. Therapies are compared in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel trial with a 24-month randomized treatment period. Randomization follows a 1:1 ratio. ICD therapy is enabled for all patients throughout the study. All patients receive optimal drug therapy for arrhythmia and heart failure treatment.
The purpose of this study is to find out if specialized programs in the AT500 and EnRhythm pacemakers will reduce the number of irregular heartbeat in the upper chamber of the heart and reduce symptoms (such as shortness of breath, dizziness, and others).
The purpose of the study is to compare two device settings (sets of instructions) used by the ICD. The Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator ("ICD") can be set to use one wire (top or bottom of the heart) or two wires (top and bottom). The study will compare how much time either ICD wire is used by the ICD and the status of congestive heart failure.
This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction ≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires. The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure.
This is a prospective, randomized controlled (1:1) multicenter trial. The pilot study will be conducted up to three clinical sites in the United States. The primary purpose of this study is to compare the overall safety and efficacy between the leadless pacemaker and left bundle area pacing.
The purpose of this study is to use real-world evidence to validate that conduction system pacing (CSP), delivered via a Medtronic 3830 catheter-delivered lead and a Medtronic dual-chamber transvenous pacemaker, is a safe and effective alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to deliver cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), as documented in the clinical literature.
The goal of this prospective single center clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing simultaneous exercise stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CPET-CMR) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with pre-existing left bundle branch area pacemakers (LBBAP) programmed to an atrial sensing mode. Measurements of right ventricular, left ventricular function, and exercise capacity will be obtained at various LBBAP programming parameters at rest and during low intensity exercise. The main aims of the study are: * Demonstrate the safety and feasibility of performing CPET-CMR in patients with pre-existing LBBAP programmed to P-synchronous ventricular pacing mode. * Generate preliminary data evaluating differences in RV function, LV function, and exercise capacity during various pacemaker programming settings.
The purpose of the BIO-CONDUCT study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Solia CSP S pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch area (LBBA). Safety will be assessed by evaluating serious adverse device effects that occur through 3 months post-implant. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating implant success rate.
This is a prospective, randomized crossover study. The objective of the study is to determine if a pacing rate of 80 beats per minute (bpm) improves exercise tolerance during the 6-minute walk test. The investigators will randomly assign half of the participants to a starting rate of 60 bpm and then switch them to a rate of 80 bpm for 3 months, and vice versa.
The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the impact of Multipoint Pacing (MPP) and SyncAV programming on ventricular electrical activation time and activation sequence using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
This is a platform protocol designed to be flexible so that it is suitable for a range of interventions and settings within diverse health care systems and community settings with incorporation into clinical COVID-19 management programs and treatment plans if results achieve key study outcomes. This protocol is a prospective, multi-center, multi-arm, randomized, controlled platform trial evaluating interventions to address and improve exercise intolerance and post-exertional malaise (PEM) as manifestations of Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC). The focus of this protocol is to assess interventions that can improve exercise capacity, daily activities tolerance, and quality of life in patients with PASC.
This a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients that undergo coronary sinus(CS) lead revision, comparing epicardial lead placement to coronary sinus pacing(CSP) in those that had lead failure.
The study is a randomized, single-blind crossover prospective study in which investigators will determine the clinical outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacing modalities in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Only patients are blinded. This is a small-scale study from which future larger scale randomized controls can be performed. The primary endpoint will be the effect of BiV and RV pacing setting on the 6-minute walk test.
The purpose of this study is to determine if physiologic pacing will improve symptoms and outcomes in patients with symptomatic first-degree heart block (pr interval ≥250ms).
The study is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ cardiac pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch area (LBBA).
This study aims to investigate whether the investigators can improve heart function in patients with heart failure who have undergone cardiac resynchronization therapy, but have not had an improvement in their heart function at least one year after the procedure. The investigators will evaluate whether placing a new pacing lead (electrode) in a different part of the heart may increase heart function and decrease heart failure symptoms.
This study will utilize 3D mapping as a tool to explore electro-anatomical and electrocardiographic characteristics of the Left Bundle Branch Area. We plan on prospectively reviewing the data found from 3D mapping the left bundle branch implantation cases and using the data to improve understanding of electro-anatomical characteristics of this area for a better definition of the implantation target and depth.
The goal of this observational study is to learn more about whether or not the use of heart ultrasound during pacemaker implantation is helpful. The main questions this aims to answer are: 1. Does this help the doctors with figuring out the wire location during implantation? 2. Does this reduce the wire placement procedure time? 3. Does this reduce the x-ray imaging time during the procedure? Participants will be asked to: 1. Have a physical exam and Echocardiogram (ECG) at initial visit, 2 weeks post implant, and 3 months post implant. 2. Have a urine pregnancy test (if applicable) 3. Have a heart ultrasound during implant procedure 4. Answer questions related to heart failure symptoms to see what stage of heart failure is present 5. Have device interrogation (a wand placed over the chest to see that the device is working properly) at a visit 2 weeks post implant and at 3 months post implant.
This project utilizes a novel cardiac pacing approach hypothesized to initiate beneficial cardiac conditioning and remodeling over a period of time.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.
This study will examine the effects of protein (whey) supplementation added to the normal diet of pre-diabetes or diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) men and women on plasma glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and total body fat levels. Specifically, this study will directly quantify the impact of 3x/day timed ingestion of supplemental whey protein (20 grams of 80 calories per serving) added to the normal diet of free-living pre-diabetic or T2DM men and women over an 8-week study period on the major diagnostic outcome of pre-diabetic and T2DM (HbA1c levels) and total body fat levels. This study will quantify changes in HbA1C and total body fat levels in 24 pre-diabetics or T2DM participants.
The investigators aim to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of benefit of His-bundle pacing enhanced cardiac resynchronization therapy (His-CRT) vs. cardiac resynchronization therapy (BIV-CRT) in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block (RBBB).
The purpose of the BIO-CONDUCT study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Solia S pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch (LBB) area. Safety will be assessed by evaluating serious adverse device effects that occur through 3 months post-implant. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating implant success rate.
Despite identification of optimal ventricular pacing sites, which not only avoid dyssynchronous activation but can restore ventricular synchrony, optimal atrial pacing sites have not yet been identified. Specialized conduction tracts do not exist in the atria as they do in the ventricle. Activating the atria in a manner that preserves or improves interatrial synchrony may provide clinical benefit based on recent data. Prior site-selective right atrial septal pacing (RAS) pacing studies relied on non-specific fluoroscopic guidance during lead placement. These studies were limited by the lack of an electrogram target and electrical measures of successful atrial resynchronization. The goal of this study is to prospectively evaluate Bachmann's bundle lead placement guided by fluoroscopy and electrical markers (an endocardial electrogram target and paced P-wave criteria) and determine its anti-arrhythmic efficacy compared with right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. Patients presenting for pacemaker placement with an indication for an atrial lead are randomized to either electrically-guided BB lead placement or RAA lead placement and then followed for 15 months.
The HBP Synchrony Using ECG Belt study is a prospective, non-randomized single site physician-initiated research study. The study will collect ECG Belt data from up to 30 subjects at one single center. The target population will include subjects with a currently implanted Medtronic cardiac implantable device who have a HIS placed lead. The purpose of the study is to characterize the electrical dispersion using the ECG Belt provided by Medtronic in patients who have a HIS placed lead and understanding the amount of synchrony with intrinsic conduction compared to HIS pacing.
The purpose of the CSPOT study is to determine the best mode of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacing for different populations of CRT patients, comparing traditional biventricular or left ventricular pacing (BiV), conduction system pacing (CSP)-only, and conduction system pacing optimized therapy (CSPOT) also known as a combination of conduction system pacing (CSP) and left ventricular (LV) pacing. Additionally, safety of the system will be assessed.
The LEADR study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Next Generation ICD lead. The LEADR LBBAP study is being conducted under the existing US FDA Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) for the Next Generation ICD Lead and is designed to confirm the safety and defibrillation efficacy of the Next Generation ICD Lead when placed in the LBBAP location in ICD and LOT-CRT patient population.