2,628 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This trial is a pilot-scale, single institution randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of administering dapagliflozin for cardiovascular risk reduction in the postpartum period. The target population is patients at high risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes within five years post-delivery. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive either: 1) dapagliflozin (10mg daily) for six months (DAPA group) or 2) an orally administered, daily placebo (Control group). The study hypothesizes: The dapagliflozin group will have higher cardiovascular risk reduction scores than the Control Group.
This study proposes a three-arm randomized-controlled trial (RCT) that evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of combining a mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) and open-label placebo (OLP) treatment for individuals with chronic pain. Individuals with chronic pain will be recruited to participate in an 8-week trial, with a subsequent 3-month post-treatment follow-up. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following three conditions: 1. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) 2. OLP treatment 3. combination of MBSR and OLP treatment
The goal of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of Dostarlimab compared to Placebo in adult participants with HNSCC (Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma)
This research study is being conducted to find out how easy, comfortable, and safe intravaginal rings are for women to use. The two rings used in this study do not dispense any medications, are the same size, but differ in their flexibility and hardness. This study will enroll approximately 100 HIV-negative persons, aged18-45 years, and assigned female sex at birth from sites in the United States, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. Participants will be randomly assigned to use (self-insert) Ring A for 4 weeks and then Ring B for 4 weeks or Ring B first followed by Ring A. There will be a 1-3-week rest period between using the two different rings. The study involves answering questions, undergoing pelvic examinations, and collecting blood and vaginal fluid samples over a total of 7 in-person visits and 2 telephone calls over approximately 9-11 weeks. In addition, both participants and approximately 30 of their sexual partners will be asked to take part in in-depth interviews to further assess acceptability, attitudes, and experiences with ring use to gauge interest in the future use of intravaginal rings as a HIV prevention option.
This study will enroll approximately 100 HIV-negative persons, aged18-45 years, and assigned female sex at birth from sites in the United States, Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. The study will assess the acceptability and safety of two placebo vaginal films. The placebo films do not contain any active medication, are the same size, but differ by shape (square versus rounded corners). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two films and asked to use (self-insert) the assigned film two times (approximately one month apart). Participants will be asked to refrain from sexual activity during the first month of use and may resume usual sexual activity during the second month of use. The study involves answering questions, undergoing pelvic examinations, and collecting blood and vaginal fluid samples. The study involves a total of 10 visits/contacts, including in person visits and telephone calls over approximately 9 weeks. In addition, both participants and approximately 30 of their sexual partners will be asked to take part in in depth interviews to further assess acceptability, attitudes, and experiences with film use to gauge interest in the future use of vaginal films as a HIV prevention option.
This trial aims to investigate whether placebo in isolation (open and hidden) has a specific neural signature in stroke subjects thus providing a novel mechanism to explain placebo effects that can be used to ultimately enhance stroke rehabilitation therapies.
This is a prospective, single center, double blind, randomized, crossover feasibility study of oral ketamine versus placebo for the treatment of anxiety in patients with pancreatic cancer currently receiving or within 12 weeks of receiving cancer targeted therapy. The primary objective is to determine the feasibility of enrolling subjects and treatment adherence. The secondary objectives are to describe the safety and tolerability. Exploratory objectives are to assess the effect of ketamine/placebo on Depression, Anxiety, Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities as measured by PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 7a and the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 of Patient Reported Outcomes, as well as changes in circulatory inflammatory cytokines, blood glutamine levels, and other biomarkers of anxiety and/or depression.
The goal of the proposed study is to examine the efficacy of using an honest placebo to relieve pain for patients with an acute pain condition. People with acute pain will receive their standard dose of opioid medication for pain management. In addition, some people will be asked to take placebo pills, honestly described as placebos, as well. Patients will answer a few short questions over the phone once per day for seven days about pain and opioid use. The investigators hypothesize that participants in the open label placebo group will take fewer opioids and have less pain than those in the treatment as usual group.
The opioid epidemic is a considerable problem in the United States, and prescription opioids significantly contribute to the epidemic. Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are inherently at increased risk for opioid dependence as surgical treatment can cause significant pain and up to 50% of patients also suffer from psychiatric comorbidities. Novel methods are needed to decrease opioid consumption following HNC surgeries to limit the risk of chronic opioid dependence in these patients. Conditioning therapy with placebo aims to elicit a classically conditioned response to an inactive medication through consistent pairing of the medication with a neutral stimulus (i.e. an odor) and has been shown to be effective for decreasing the amount of active drug require for certain clinical responses, including for acute pain. However, studies have not been completed for the treatment of acute pain in the inpatient post-operative setting. The overall goal of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of conditioned open-label placebo (COLP) as an adjunct for post-operative pain management in complex head and neck cancer patients. This randomized, controlled, open-label trial will specifically compare post-operative opioid consumption and pain scales between patients receiving multimodal analgesia along with conditioned open-label placebo (COLP group) to those receiving multimodal analgesia, alone (Treatment as usual group). Findings from this study will determine the efficacy of COLP as an innovative approach to decrease opioid consumption and improve pain control in head and neck cancer patients and will provide rationale for development of future large scale trials.
This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study that aims to assess the efficacy and safety of GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) in participants with severe uncontrolled asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype
A single, ascending-dose design with five dose-cohorts of 8 subjects. Forty healthy adults aged 18 to 45, inclusive, will be recruited and admitted at multiple sites. Each subject will be randomized to receive either SAR440894 or matching placebo via 60-minute intravenous infusion. In each cohort of 8 subjects, the randomization ratio will be 6 active to 2 placebo, and 2 sentinel subjects (one from each active and placebo group) will be dosed first. Dosing of the next dose-cohort will be dependent on acceptable meeting predefined safety criteria in the preceding cohort. Each subject's participation will take place over approximately 150 days, not including the screening visit. There are no hypotheses for this phase I study. The primary objective will be to determine the safety of single ascending intravenous (IV) infusions of SAR440894 when administered in healthy adults.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the current leading cause of disability worldwide and adolescence is an especially vulnerable period for the onset of depression. Non-pharmacologic approaches are particularly attractive as treatment of adolescent depression due to the elevated risks of side effects related to the use of psychotropic drugs during development. A recent meta-analysis detected a positive and significant effect of non-deceptive placebos (open-label placebo, OLP) for a series of clinical conditions, including adult depression. To the investigators' knowledge, no studies of OLP have been conducted in depressed adolescents to date, although placebo response rates in adolescent depression are especially high, accounting for over 80% of the actual response to antidepressant treatment. The study's main objective is to estimate the effectiveness and understand the mechanism of OLP in depressed adolescents. The central hypothesis is that the mechanism by which OLP exerts its action in adolescent depression is by forming a positive expectation, which activates endogenous mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated neurotransmission in a network of regions implicated in emotion, stress regulation, and the pathophysiology of MDD, namely, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) - striato - amygdalo - thalamic network. The hypothesis has been formulated on the basis of published research and preliminary data. The investigators will test the hypothesis by performing structural and functional neuroimaging in 60 untreated 13-18 year-old adolescents with mild to moderate depression. The proposed research is significant, because it is expected to elucidate the mechanism of action of OLP and advance the understanding of the neural underpinnings of positive expectations in adolescent depression.
Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral tropifexor \& licogliflozin combination therapy and each monotherapy, compared with placebo for treatment of adult patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis.
Fatigue is one of the most prevalent and disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis. Current treatments, including pharmacological, physical therapy, sleep regulation and psychological interventions are of marginal benefit. Pharmacological treatments have inconsistent evidence. Recent studies show that non-deceptive open-label placebos (OLP) have moderate-to-large effects on symptoms, including fatigue, in adults with a variety of medical conditions. Hence, this is a pilot and feasibility study to obtain data on the feasibility and effects of OLP for multiple sclerosis related fatigue and its impact to provide the basis for a competitive NIH application. This pilot study will be the first study to evaluate whether OLP, that garners full consent and engages patients in their wellness, may offer a safe, effective treatment for multiple sclerosis related fatigue.
This study \[contRAst 2 (201791: NCT03970837)\] is a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double blind study to assess the safety and efficacy of GSK3196165 in combination with csDMARD(s), for the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to csDMARD(s) or bDMARD(s). The study will consist of a screening phase of up to 6 weeks followed by a 52 week treatment phase in which participants will be randomized in a ratio of 6:6:3:1:1:1 to receive GSK3196165 150 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) weekly, GSK3196165 90 mg SC weekly, tofacitinib capsules (cap) 5 mg twice a day or placebo (three arms, each placebo arm will have 12 weeks placebo followed by 40 weeks active treatment) respectively, all in combination with csDMARD(s). Participants who, in investigator's judgement will benefit from extended treatment with GSK3196165 may be included in the long-term extension study \[contRAst X (209564: NCT04333147)\]. For those participants who do not continue into the long term-extension study, there will be an 8 week safety follow-up visit following the treatment phase.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of risankizumab 180 mg and 360 mg versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in adult participants diagnosed for at least one year before the Baseline visit.
Durvalumab or Placebo in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Patients With 1st Line Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (TOPAZ-1)
This study seeks to determine the effectiveness of Rucaparib as maintenance therapy for metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer, after 1-2 prior lines of therapy.
The purpose of this study to compare the effect of Biofreeze® versus a Placebo on neck pain, disability, fear avoidance, and range of motion prior to and following cervical manipulation over the course of one week among patients with acute neck pain.
This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in adults who require regular red blood cell transfusion due to (β)-thalassemia. The study is divided into the following periods: * Historical Period, * Screening/Run-in Period, * Double-blind Treatment Period (48 weeks), * Double-blind Long-term Treatment Period, (at the investigator's discretion an additional 48 weeks), * Open-Label Phase post unblinding and upon Data Monitoring Committee positive recommendation * Post-treatment Follow-up Period
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The mainstay for treatment involves the use of inhaled medications, including short and/or long-acting bronchodilators along with inhaled corticosteroids. For inhaled medications, the choice of inhalation device is an important consideration because an inadequate technique reduces the effects of inhalation. Therefore, the development of an easy-to-use inhaler that delivers the drug to the lungs effectively, is important. This study will assess the correct use of the ELLIPTA inhaler by subjects with COPD and to assess ease of use of the ELLIPTA inhaler, as rated by those subjects determined to be using the inhaler correctly. Study will be divided into two visits i.e. Screening/Visit 1 (day 1) and Visit 2 (Day 28 +/-2) with a phone call on Day 8+/-2 days of Visit 1 to assess safety. In this multi-center, single-arm, randomised (to receive one of two versions of the ELLIPTA inhaler Ease of Use questionnaires), open-label, placebo study, only subjects who are have never used the ELLIPTA inhaler before and have an established diagnosis of COPD and receiving COPD therapy and are able to demonstrate correct use of the ELLIPTA inhaler at Visit 1 will be considered eligible to participate in this study. Approximately 252 subjects will be screened with an expectation of 208 subjects completing the study while demonstrating correct ELLIPTA inhaler use at visit 2. ELLIPTA is a registered trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline Group of Companies.
Study D5553C0003 is a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 efficacy and safety study with 24-week and 52-week extension phases of simultaneous administration of exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (QD) compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg QD alone in patients with Type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin.
Study D5553C00002 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, Phase 3 study to compare the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) added to titrated basal insulin glargine with or without metformin to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine with or without metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Eligible patients will be randomized at Visit 5 (Day 1) to receive either EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin ≥1500 mg/day, or placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin ≥1500 mg/day, during the 28-week treatment period.
The purpose of this study is to assess 3 different scoring systems to evaluate the adhesive quality of placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial\]) JNJ-35685-AAA-G-023-G transdermal (through the skin) systems during a single system 72-hour application, replicated 3 times, of 2 patch sizes (5.5 centimeter\^2 \[cm\^2\] and 44 cm\^2).
This study plans to learn more about whether ibuprofen can reduce pain after removal of a ureteral stent more than a placebo. Some patients experience pain after removal of a ureteral stent. The investigators plan to learn how often this occurs and whether it can be prevented. The investigators hypothesize that children who have a temporary, indwelling ureteral stent will experience a significantly less post-operative pain if given a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) prior to removal of the ureteral stent when compared to placebo. The investigators hypothesize that the incidence of severe post-stent removal pain is similar to an adult population.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antitussive (cough-suppressing) effects of two liquid medications: a combination of diphenhydramine and phenylephrine in a naturally cocoa flavoring, and, dextromethorphan syrup, compared with placebo.
The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal dose or doses of HM11260C, when administered once a week under the skin, to improve the control of blood sugar levels in patients with early-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This is a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, Phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of pimasertib plus SAR245409 and pimasertib placebo administered once per day compared to pimasertib administered twice per day plus SAR245409 placebo administered once per day in participants with previously treated unresectable low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or serous borderline ovarian or peritoneal tumors.
The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if receiving valproic acid (VPA) compared to a placebo can reduce the amount of time you will need to have an indwelling pleural catheter compared to the standard of care, which involves using an indwelling pleural catheter alone. VPA is designed to stop cancer cells from dividing and maturing. This may cause the cancer cells to become less malignant and cause less pleural fluid production. A placebo is not a drug. It looks like the study drug but is not designed to treat any disease or illness. It is designed to be compared with a study drug to learn if the study drug has any real effect.
The main clinical study will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long term study involving a 100 week treatment period. The purpose of this study is to test for superiority of treatment with belimumab 10 mg/kg plus supportive therapy compared to placebo plus supportive therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). The purpose of this study is also to investigate the effect of initiating earlier treatment with belimumab compared to delayed treatment with current immunosuppressive treatment regimens. The study will also determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of belimumab and further explore the mechanism of action of Belimumab as well as effects on quality of life. All subjects (on either active treatment or placebo) will receive background supportive therapy throughout the main clinical study, which includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) unless contraindicated and may include statins, diuretics, dietary salt restriction but excludes immunosuppressants (except low dose corticosteroids). Screening will be done within 5 to 2 weeks before the first scheduled dose of study treatment. A total of 94 evaluable subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio such that 47 subjects receive intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg and 47 receive intravenous placebo. Subjects will be dosed on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 4 weeks through to, and including, Week 100, resulting in a total of 27 doses (giving 104 weeks of drug exposure). The dosing frequency will be adjusted to every 2 weeks if the subject's proteinuria as assessed by urinary protein creatinine ratio (PCR) is greater than 1000mg/mmol (greater than 10 g/24 h), to compensate for loss of belimumab in the urine. Subjects who are withdrawn from study treatment at any time during the study, eg for rescue therapy, will participate in follow-up visits every 12 weeks up to week 104. A subject will be regarded as having completed the main clinical study if they complete all phases of the main clinical study (screening, treatment period, 4 week and 16 week post last dose short term safety follow-up). Subjects who complete the main clinical study will therefore participate in the main clinical study for approximately 28 months. After the main clinical study, there will be a 5 year (long term) follow-up phase to assess long term outcomes.