286 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This multi-centered, randomized controlled trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of home use of the novel Reia System (RS), which includes the Reia pessary and applicator, compared to standard pessary care (Gellhorn or ring with/without support without knob) among women with stage II-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A total of 182 participants will be recruited among pessary naïve patients who are symptomatic and choose a vaginal pessary for management of their POP from study sites specializing in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS). Participants will be assigned via 1:1 randomization using computer generated numbers in permutated groups of variable block sizes to either the intervention (the Reia System, RS) or standard pessary care (SPC) stratified by site. Participation in this trial will involve a total of four visits over six months. The primary outcome measure will be satisfaction measured at the six-month time point. Secondary outcomes will include validated surveys to assess quality of life, number of self-management events, ease/difficulty of pessary insertion/removal, importance of ability to self-manage pessary, and adverse events. Specific Aims Aim 1: To compare satisfaction with pessary use and management between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary. Aim 2: To assess successful fitting, number of refitting visits, number of self-management events and continued pessary use over a 6-month period between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary. Aim 3: To compare ease/difficulty of pessary use and importance of ability to self-manage, as well as quality of life over a 6-month period between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary. Aim 4: To measure rates of adverse events and risk factors for adverse events over a 6-month period between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary.
Overprescribing opioids is considered a major contributor to the opioid crisis. Hill et al. demonstrated that within a general surgery practice, over 70% of the prescribed opioid pills were never taken. Disturbingly, 45% of patients who did not take opioids at all on their day of discharge were discharged with an opioid prescription (Chen et al). Recent initiatives have attempted to utilize restrictive opioid prescribing protocols for postoperative pain management in which patients were prescribed a limited number of opioid tablets (Hallway et al) or prescribed opioids only if they were used as an inpatient (Mark et al). These well-conducted studies show that restrictive opioid prescribing policies achieve the goal of reducing excess opioid exposure without causing undue harm, inconvenience or dissatisfaction among patients. The objective of this study is to determine if a restrictive opioid prescription protocol (in which patients are not prescribed postoperative opioids unless they request them) is acceptable to patients after ambulatory and major urogynecologic surgery, compared to standard opioid prescribing practices. The study investigators believe that physicians can capitalize on the new ability to electronically prescribe opioids for patients who require them, to prevent over-prescribing without impacting patient care. The study also intends to describe postoperative opioid use patterns in the urogynecologic population, including factors predictive of opioid use and non-use. The results of this research will have a significant and timely impact by helping to reduce opioid overprescribing and informing future prescribing guidelines in the field of urogynecology.
The objective of the study is to assess the long term safety, durability of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the NeuGuide™ system when used for vaginal colpopexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
The purpose of this study to is to determine the incidence of post-operative ptosis in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery. An additional purpose is to identify pre-operative and intra-operative factors which correlate to the development of post-operative ptosis in vitreoretinal surgery cases.
To prospectively observe the outcomes of surgical prolapse treatment in terms of urinary, bowel, and sexual function, quality of life, patient satisfaction, cost, and achieving patient determined treatment goals.
1. This is a prospective, multi-center, post market study, which will be conducted under a common protocol. 2. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate long-term efficacy of the AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System devices for prolapse repair. 3. The study population is female subjects \> 21 years of age who require surgical reconstruction of their pelvic floor due to prolapse. 4. The clinical data will be analyzed by comparing post-treatment data with the baseline data, with the subject acting as her own control. The follow-up is for two years after the procedure. 5. Prolapse improvement measured by ICS POP-Q Stage at 12-months will be the primary endpoint of the study. The secondary endpoints include quality of life changes from baseline and adverse event rates.
The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that the addition of a standardized technique of interpositional synthetic polypropylene mesh placement improves the one-year outcome of vaginal reconstructive surgery for anterior prolapse compared to traditional vaginal reconstructive surgery without mesh.
The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that the addition of a standardized technique of interpositional synthetic polypropylene mesh placement improves the one-year outcome of vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse compared to traditional vaginal reconstructive surgery without mesh.
Pelvic organ prolapse is common among women with a prevalence that has been estimated to be as high as 30%. Prolapse may be corrected by surgery using either a vaginal or abdominal incision. Some women develop stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgery. A prior randomized trial has shown that use of a Burch sling at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy decreases the risk of urinary incontinence; however, the benefit of adding an anti incontinence procedure to prevent SUI at the time of prolapse surgery performed via a vaginal approach is unclear. Thus, the objective of the Outcomes following vaginal Prolapse repair and mid Urethral Sling (OPUS) trial is to determine whether prophylactic treatment with Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT)® at the time of prolapse surgery done via a vaginal approach is effective in preventing urinary incontinence.
The Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Effort (CARE) trial is a research study designed to evaluate whether the addition of a second surgical procedure in addition to a procedure for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects the rates of urinary incontinence. This study will follow women in the CARE study for 10 years from the time of the surgery to compare success and complication rates in the two groups. Recruitment into this study is open only to women that already participated in CARE. Recruitment into CARE is closed.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if retropubic midurethral sling (RP-MUS) or bulkamide injection (PAHG) at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair is better from the patient's perspective. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the average difference in the urogenital distress inventory (UDI) long form score 24 months after surgery for each procedure? Which procedure has the fewest complications and lowest short- and long-term morbidity profile? Participants will: Be blinded and randomized to one of two procedures for the duration of the study, 24 months. Complete 6 total visits for the clinical trial including validated questionnaires. Few participants will be selected to complete a qualitative interview at 3 timepoints over 24 month duration of the study.
The goal of this study is to assess improvement in subjects who have undergone Axis Dermis, biologic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair. \[describe participant population/health conditions\]. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * Is the leading edge of the prolapse above the hymen * Does subject notice a bulge Participants will undergo Axis Dermis pelvic organ prolapse repair procedure.
This study is being done to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using flat polypropylene Restorelle® mesh, an ultra-lightweight mesh, for transvaginal use in surgically correcting certain specific cases of pelvic organ prolapse, such as recurrent (previous failed native tissue repair), large stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse, and those with symptomatic uterine prolapse desiring uterine-sparing surgery (called hysteropexy).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of 30 mL intraperitoneal Bupivacaine without epinephrine 0.25% on postoperative pain control in patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair. The investigators hypothesize that use of intraperitoneal Bupivacaine will decrease postoperative pain scores and opiate consumption in the postoperative period, following pelvic organ prolapse repair.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Dermabond with non-absorbable sutures in skin closure after brow ptosis surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * if Dermabond provides equivalent wound healing compared to conventional non-absorbable skin suture techniques * if Dermabond provides equivalent scar appearance compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques * if Dermabond results in equivalent complication rates compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques Participants will have be randomly selected to have either Dermabond or non-absorbable suture closure methods. Scar analysis and both participant and provider surveys will be performed to assess the differences between groups, if any.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of injecting platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into the vaginal tissue as an adjunct therapy at the time of prolapse surgery
This study will recruit women scheduled to undergo vaginal apical suspension surgery (either uterosacral ligament suspension or sacrospinous ligament fixation) with or without other prolapse or anti-incontinence procedures. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to preoperative gabapentin or preoperative placebo (both patients and investigators will be blinded). Note the control group will receive preoperative acetaminophen/celecoxib/placebo and the treatment group will receive preoperative acetaminophen/celecoxib/gabapentin (preoperative acetaminophen/celecoxib are part of our current ERAS protocol). The primary outcome will be postoperative opioid use in the first 24 hours postoperatively measured in morphine milligram equivalents.
The aim is to compare outcomes of two different procedures to prevent occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients who are having pelvic organ prolapse surgeries
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of surgery for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse to determine which surgery works best from a patient's perspective and has the lowest number of short-term and long-term complications.
This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial comparing mitral valve (MV) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) to surgical repair (1:1 ratio) in patients with primary, degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). The trial will be conducted in the U.S., Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom, and is designed as a strategy trial. Thus, all devices legally marketed for TEER of primary degenerative MR in a particular country are eligible to be used in this trial.
This is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial investigating if a patient educational video on pelvic organ prolapse improves patient understanding of this pelvic floor disorder and satisfaction in their healthcare decision making for its management.
This study is trying to see if people from different backgrounds have different feelings when making treatment decisions about prolapse.
This study will examine whether surgeons should add a prophylactic posterior colpoperineorrhaphy to a mesh-augmented apical prolapse repair.
The purpose of the study will be to assess the efficacy and safety of bladder BOTOX® for overactive bladder symptoms, such as urinary urgency and frequency, given at the time of prolapse surgery.
The objective of the EVeRLAST study is to determine whether expedited resumption of postoperative activity levels is non-inferior to standard activity restrictions with respect to short-term anatomic prolapse outcomes. We hypothesize that immediate resumption of physical activities as tolerated will result in noninferior surgical outcomes following prolapse surgery when compared to standard postoperative activity restrictions. Participants will be enrolled and randomized at their preoperative clinic visit to one of two treatment arms: Arm 1: Standard instructions (no heavy lifting over 10lbs for 6 weeks; return to work at 4 weeks for sedentary work and 6 weeks for manual labor) Arm 2: Liberal instructions (no restrictions; resume activities and work as soon as able) We will also collect subjective and objective measures of pre- and postoperative physical activity, through the use of patient-reported physical activity assessments and wrist-worn accelerometers. Accelerometer data will be collected at the preoperative, 2-week-postoperative, and 6-week-postoperative time points. Accelerometer data will also be used to calculate time to resumption of normal activities, defined as time at which a patient resumes greater than 90% of her baseline preoperative level of physical activity. We will additionally be collecting data on relevant patient-reported outcomes of pelvic floor symptom severity, health-related quality of life measures, postoperative pain, time to return to work (where relevant), and patient global impression of improvement. Postoperative anatomic assessments will be performed at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively by blinded study personnel
Robotic sacrocolpopexy (a procedure for female pelvic organ prolapse) has been demonstrated to have equivalent surgical outcomes to open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and has been previously deemed more cost effective due to the longer hospital course following open procedures. The total cost of these procedures, including all costs of hospitalization as well as costs associated with the 30 days following surgery have previously been evaluated by the investigators. However, previous research is lacking in both the specific cost components that contribute to intraoperative cost of surgery as well as the patient perceived outcomes following these two procedures. This project aims to evaluate the marginal costs of surgery and to survey sacrocolpopexy patients to evaluate their satisfaction with outcomes and surgical scars.
Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is a common pelvic floor disorder described as descent of the vaginal apex after hysterectomy. The incidence of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse has been reported to follow 11.6% of hysterectomies performed for prolapse and 1.8% for other benign diseases. The majority of surgical repairs to correct post-hysterectomy vault prolapse are approached via a transvaginal route. A common transvaginal procedure to correct vaginal vault prolapse is the uterosacral ligament suspension. Traditionally, the uterosacral ligaments have been accessed intraperitoneally to perform the vaginal suspension. More recently, an extraperitoneal approach has been utilized with good results. There is limited evidence comparing the the two approaches. Thus, the objectives of this study are to compare compare operative time, hospital stay, cost, surgical success, and other perioperative outcomes between the two approaches.
Comparing FDA-approved DermaPure with patient's own native tissue surgically for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
Patient preparedness has been associated with increased patient satisfaction, decreased postoperative pain and decreased postoperative narcotic use; however, little is known regarding the optimal way to prepare patients prior to pelvic reconstructive surgery. The primary aim of this study is to determine if a preoperative counseling in person visit has similar rates of patient preparedness as a preoperative counseling phone call for women undergoing same-day pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Secondary aims evaluate patient satisfaction, postoperative pain scores and postoperative narcotic usage. Women who plan to undergo pelvic organ prolapse surgery will be randomized to a preoperative in person counseling visit or a preoperative counseling phone call. Participants will complete questionnaires to assess their preparedness, satisfaction and postoperative pain. The goal of this study is to gather information that will allow clinicians to improve patient surgical preparedness and satisfaction.
This study will assess advanced biomarkers in patients with and without vaginal prolapse. Assessments will be directed at vaginal fibroblasts and adipose derived stem cells.