This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare cancer control and health-related quality of life following pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy versus standard radical prostatectomy. The investigators hypothesize that pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy will have similar cancer control (primary outcome) and sexual function outcomes; and significantly better urinary function, penile shortening/deformity and inguinal hernia risks as compared to radical prostatectomy.
Prostate Cancer
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare cancer control and health-related quality of life following pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy versus standard radical prostatectomy. The investigators hypothesize that pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy will have similar cancer control (primary outcome) and sexual function outcomes; and significantly better urinary function, penile shortening/deformity and inguinal hernia risks as compared to radical prostatectomy.
Clinical Trial of Approaches to Prostate Cancer Surgery
-
Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States, 10065
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.
40 Years to 80 Years
MALE
No
Weill Medical College of Cornell University,
Jim C Hu, MD, MPH, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
2026-12